On the migration to v16, the primary layout view was incorrectly
removed. It's needed because of 2 reasons:
- It's referenced in the following template doing a t-call. Well, this
one can be avoided calling the new layout upstream template, but...
- This layout is done for placing some extra content (the modifications
table), as part of the layout that is not shown in the chatter for
avoiding noise.
We recreate this template inheriting the new layout template, and
adapting it properly.
TT45646
If you have defined several contract lines, each one with their
recurrency information, unmarking the check "Line recurrency" by mistake
and saving will make you lose the configuration in one shot, and also
modify the invoceability conditions.
Thus, it's reasonable to avoid to uncheck the mark once you have at
least one invoice issued for a contract with this mark checked.
TT47015
- Don't update recurring_next_date as computed
- Compute recurring_next_date for False values too + simplify compute as False values are already taken into account
In get_next_invoice_date, False values are already taken into account, so, simplifying
compute_recurring_next_date function.
- Add comment to remind updating method in next version
In v13, the `user_id` field is a related field to `invoice_user_id`, that defaults to the environment user (`self.env.user`).
Therefore, if we try to create an invoice just by passing `user_id`, it would be overwritten by the default computation of `invoice_user_id`.
This fixes it by passing the correct field and data.
TT31715
It seems that having several fields returned by `Form` as `False` that
are related to one2many inverse field, makes Odoo ORM mad, and get to
an unbalanced move when generating the invoice.
Cleaning these values assures to work without problems.
Not able to provide a regression test, as I don't get to reproduce the
conditions to happen in test environment, but the patch is safe and
harmless anyways.
TT30842
Fine-tuning of cd086ddbb4. We shouldn't do
this adjustment if the line recurrence is set, as if so, there's no
possibility of adding post-paid lines with proper dates on a running
contract.
On the commercial entity, the count shows all contracts of child partners.
However clicking on the action might show no contract, as the action only
restricted the domain to the partner itself.
We extract the domain into a function to share it in both cases.
Co-authored by @Lopsanz
In a multicompany scenario where a contact belongs to a company and has contracts in several companies, if the user goes to the contact to edit anything, when saving, it will trigger the recomputation of the `commercial_partner_id` field, which gets populated to all the related contracts, and will undeniably fail with an `AccessError`.
A simple test is provided that, without the fix, fails like this:
```
2020-06-25 07:21:24,859 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ERROR: test_multicompany_partner_edited (odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract.TestContract)
2020-06-25 07:21:24,859 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` Editing a partner with contracts in several companies works.
2020-06-25 07:21:24,859 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: Traceback (most recent call last):
2020-06-25 07:21:24,859 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/auto/addons/contract/tests/test_contract.py", line 2513, in test_multicompany_partner_edited
2020-06-25 07:21:24,859 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` 'parent_id': parent_partner.id,
2020-06-25 07:21:24,859 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/auto/addons/partner_autocomplete/models/res_partner.py", line 183, in write
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` res = super(ResPartner, self).write(values)
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/custom/src/odoo/odoo/addons/base/models/res_partner.py", line 570, in write
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` result = result and super(Partner, self).write(vals)
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/auto/addons/mail/models/mail_thread.py", line 321, in write
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` result = super(MailThread, self).write(values)
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/auto/addons/mail/models/mail_activity.py", line 613, in write
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` return super(MailActivityMixin, self).write(vals)
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/custom/src/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 3381, in write
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` self.recompute()
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/custom/src/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 5308, in recompute
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` target._write(dict(vals))
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/custom/src/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 3433, in _write
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` self.check_access_rule('write')
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` File "/opt/odoo/custom/src/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 3081, in check_access_rule
2020-06-25 07:21:24,860 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` + ' - ({} {}, {} {})'.format(_('Records:'), invalid.ids[:6], _('User:'), self._uid)
2020-06-25 07:21:24,861 33 ERROR devel odoo.addons.contract.tests.test_contract: ` odoo.exceptions.AccessError: ('The requested operation cannot be completed due to security restrictions. Please contact your system administrator.\n\n(Document type: Contract, Operation: write) - (Records: [101], User: 12)', None)
```
@Tecnativa TT24482
