Previous patch by Alexis created a co-dependency between
account_payment_order and account_banking_sepa_direct_debit, which is
not correct.
This patch avoids such problem and fix properly the test, although
the utility of some of them is debatible.
This adapts the old bank.payment.line records to account.payment records
according the new approach, taking into account if you come from v14
with the refactoring applied.
The previous approach creates manually the journal entries and does all
the hard work, plus not being 100% compatible with the bank statement
reconciliation widget (requiring a patch on OCB to see blue lines).
That decision made sense on the moment it was done (v9), where the
native payment model (account.payment) was very limited, and wasn't able
to store all the needed information for the bank transaction.
Now that the limitations are gone, we can get rid off this extra model,
and generate instead `account.payment` records, using both the native
model + methods to perform the same operations.
This serves also to workaround the problem found in #966.
All the code, views and tests of main module have been adapted to this
new approach in this commit. Later commits will adapt the rest of the
modules of the suite, and add migration scripts to transit from the
previous approach to this new one.
TT39832
- Add a hook method to retrieve communication type and communication
- Improve normal communication if there is a credit note
If there is a credit note that partially cancel an invoice, the payment communication
should be the combination of the invoice reference and the credit note one.
- Remove not needed assert as parameter is required
- Use the 'payment_reference' field if filled in
- Add existing payment references to communication
If some movements have been reconciled with the original invoice,
their references should be added in communication too.
e.g.: Manual credit notes
- Don't duplicate communication reference
The test introduced in 7bdb286aa1 is not
valid, as its indentation made it to not be executed. Anyways, the
content and the tested things are also not correct.
This commit split the tests for outbound payment in a base inheritable class that
can be reused in other dependant modules, and the test of this module.
similar to 86bd1a2525
Add partner_bank_id column to avoid MemoryError on an existing Odoo
instance with lots of data.
partner_bank_id on account.move.line requires payment_order_ok to be True
which it won't be as it's newly introduced - again nothing to compute.
(see AccountMoveLine._compute_partner_bank_id() in models/account_move_line.py)
create_account_payment_line() is supposed to returned a form view for a
single payment order and a tree view for multiple payment orders. Before
this fix, it would return a tree view if you were payment more than 1
invoices while generating a single payment order, because the list
result_payorder_ids would contain several time the same ID.
Some tests need to be run on post-install
The bank_journal.inbound_payment_order_only field is true only if all inbound_payment_method_ids are payment_order_only True. For this we must include the "SEPA Direct Debit for customers" in test
When the test hour is around midnight, and demo data using CET/CEST
timezones, current code fails due to some asserts not having this into
consideration. This fix avoids such problem, and irons the execution
no matter the hour.
