* Short headers
* Remove label field
There's already a field in the payment mode called 'note' that is
printed on the invoices, so there's no need of another field for
that purpose. This field is added by account_banking_payment_export
* Bump version numbers
* es translations
* Name to filter for better inheratiblity
* Forgot to remove a usecase of debit_denied
* Add ACL
* Better filters on payment.order.create wizard
* Add default values for those filters on payment.mode
* FIX remove coma at end of line
* Add translatable 'label' field on payment.mode, designed to be used in invoice report
* move unused file + cleanup code
* Add sale_ok and purchase_ok filters in partner/sale/purchase form views
* Use widget=selection for payment_mode_id fields
* Update demo data
* Return res in inherit (even if res is empty in this case)
* Migration and enhancement of all modules involved in SEPA
* Clean files
* Replace deprecated workflow calls
* Translation template files
* Translations to spanish
* Use sale_ok and purchase_ok instead of tweaking payment type
2020-10-20 07:32:03 +02:00
Launchpad Translations on behalf of banking-addons-team
- account_payment_partner
- account_payment_sale
- account_payment_sale_stock
- account_payment_purchase
Filter the selection of invoices per payment type.
Add active field on payment.mode and payment.mode.type.
Add menu entry for Payment Types.
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
The modules adds `{'invisible': [('parent_id', '!=', False)]}` attribute
to `banks` group on res.partner form view. The rationale for this,
according to a comment on the view itself is:
> ... there is a domain on the 'partner_id' field of res.partner.bank
(base module) which prevents the selection of a contact
However, the domain the comment refers to is
`['|', ('is_company', '=', True), ('parent_id', '=', False)]`
So, I think the domain for the group to be invisible should be
`[('parent_id', '!=', False), ('is_company', '=', False)]`. In addition,
a parent that is a company is always its own commercial partner. So we
should have access to its payment information.
Current behavior before PR:
Bank and mandates information is hidden when a partner is a company and
has a parent.
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
Banking information should be visible if a partner is a company.
