[MRG][ADD] In account_statement_base_completion, account_statement_transactionid_completion provide YAML tests

account_statement_base_completion/__openerp__.py

@@ -57,15 +57,19 @@
 
  """,
  'website': 'http://www.camptocamp.com',
- 'init_xml': [],
- 'update_xml': [
+ 'data': [
      'statement_view.xml',
      'partner_view.xml',
      'data.xml',
      'security/ir.model.access.csv',
  ],
- 'demo_xml': [],
- 'test': [],
+ 'demo': [],
+ 'test': [
+    'test/partner.yml',
+    'test/invoice.yml',
+    'test/supplier_invoice.yml',
+    'test/completion_test.yml'
+ ],
  'installable': True,
  'images': [],
  'auto_install': False,

account_statement_base_completion/test/completion_test.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+-
+  In order to test the banking framework, I first need to create a profile
+-
+  !record {model: account.statement.profile, id: profile_test1}:
+    name: Bank EUR Profile
+    journal_id: account.bank_journal
+    commission_account_id: account.a_expense
+    company_id: base.main_company
+    balance_check: True
+    rule_ids:
+      - bank_statement_completion_rule_4
+      - bank_statement_completion_rule_5
+      - bank_statement_completion_rule_2
+      - bank_statement_completion_rule_3
+-
+  Now I create a statement. I create statment lines separately because I need
+  to find each one by XML id
+-
+  !record {model: account.bank.statement, id: statement_test1}:
+    name: Statement 2
+    profile_id: profile_test1
+    company_id: base.main_company
+-
+  I create a statement line for a CI
+-
+  !record {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_ci}:
+    name: Test autocompletion based on Customer Invoice Number
+    statement_id: statement_test1
+    ref: CI0001
+    date: '2013-12-20'
+    amount: 210.0
+-
+  I create a statement line for a SI
+-
+  !record {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_si}:
+    name: Test autocompletion based on Supplier Invoice Number
+    statement_id: statement_test1
+    ref: T2S12345
+    date: '2013-12-19'
+    amount: -65.0
+-
+  I create a statement line for the Partner Name
+-
+  !record {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_partner_name}:
+    name: Test autocompletion based on Partner Name Vauxoo
+    statement_id: statement_test1
+    ref: /
+    date: '2013-12-17'
+    amount: 600.0
+-
+  I create a statement line for the Partner Label
+-
+  !record {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_partner_label}:
+    name: test autocompletion based on text (XXX66Z) matching with partner form information (note that Ref does not exist)
+    statement_id: statement_test1
+    ref: ZU788
+    date: '2013-12-24'
+    amount: -932.4
+-
+  I run the auto complete
+-
+  !python {model: account.bank.statement}: |
+    result = self.button_auto_completion(cr, uid, [ref("statement_test1")])
+-
+  Now I can check that all is nice and shiny, line 1. I expect the Customer
+  Invoice Number to be recognised.
+  I Use _ref, because ref conflicts with the field ref of the statement line
+-
+  !assert {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_ci, string: Check completion by CI number}:
+    - partner_id.id == _ref("base.res_partner_12")
+-
+  Line 2. I expect the Supplier invoice number to be recognised. The supplier
+  invoice was created by the account module demo data, and we confirmed it
+  here.
+-
+  !assert {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_si, string: Check completion by SI number}:
+    - partner_id.id == _ref("base.res_partner_17")
+-
+  Line 3. I check that the partner name has been recognised.
+-
+  !assert {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_partner_name, string: Check completion by partner name}:
+    - partner_id.name == 'Vauxoo'
+-
+  Line 4. I check that the partner special label has been recognised.
+-
+  !assert {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_partner_label, string: Check completion by partner label}:
+    - partner_id.id == _ref("base.res_partner_6")

account_statement_base_completion/test/invoice.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+-
+  I create a customer Invoice to be found by the completion.
+-
+  !record {model: account.invoice, id: invoice_for_completion_1}:
+    account_id: account.a_recv
+    company_id: base.main_company
+    currency_id: base.EUR
+    internal_number: CI0001
+    invoice_line:
+      - account_id: account.a_sale
+        name: '[PCSC234] PC Assemble SC234'
+        price_unit: 210.0
+        quantity: 1.0
+        product_id: product.product_product_3
+        uos_id: product.product_uom_unit
+    journal_id: account.bank_journal
+    partner_id: base.res_partner_12
+    reference_type: none
+-
+  I confirm the Invoice
+-
+  !workflow {model: account.invoice, action: invoice_open, ref: invoice_for_completion_1}
+-
+  I check that the invoice state is "Open"
+-
+  !assert {model: account.invoice, id: invoice_for_completion_1}:
+    - state == 'open'
+-
+  I check that it is given the number "CI0001"
+-
+  !assert {model: account.invoice, id: invoice_for_completion_1, string: Check CI number}:
+    - number == 'CI0001'

account_statement_base_completion/test/partner.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+-
+  I fill in the field Bank Statement Label in a Partner
+-
+  !record {model: res.partner, id: base.res_partner_6}:
+    bank_statement_label: XXX66Z

account_statement_base_completion/test/supplier_invoice.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+-
+  I check that my invoice is a supplier invoice
+-
+  !assert {model: account.invoice, id: account.demo_invoice_0, string: Check invoice type}:
+    - type == 'in_invoice'
+-
+  I add a reference to an existing supplier invoce
+-
+  !python {model: account.invoice}: |
+    self.write(cr, uid, ref('account.demo_invoice_0'), {
+      'supplier_invoice_number': 'T2S12345'
+    })
+-
+  I check a second time that my invoice is still a supplier invoice
+-
+  !assert {model: account.invoice, id: account.demo_invoice_0, string: Check invoice type 2}:
+    - type == 'in_invoice'
+-
+  Now I confirm it
+-
+  !workflow {model: account.invoice, action: invoice_open, ref: account.demo_invoice_0}
+-
+  I check that the supplier number is there
+-
+  !assert {model: account.invoice, id: account.demo_invoice_0, string: Check supplier number}:
+    - supplier_invoice_number == 'T2S12345'
+-
+  I check a third time that my invoice is still a supplier invoice
+-
+  !assert {model: account.invoice, id: account.demo_invoice_0, string: Check invoice type 3}:
+    - type == 'in_invoice'

account_statement_transactionid_completion/__openerp__.py

@@ -48,7 +48,10 @@
     "data.xml",
  ],
  'demo_xml': [],
- 'test': [],
+ 'test': [
+     'test/sale.yml',
+     'test/completion_transactionid_test.yml',
+ ],
  'installable': True,
  'images': [],
  'auto_install': True,

account_statement_transactionid_completion/test/completion_transactionid_test.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+-
+  In order to test the banking framework, I first need to create a profile
+-
+  !record {model: account.statement.profile, id: statement_profile_transactionid}:
+    name: Bank EUR Profile (transaction ID)
+    journal_id: account.bank_journal
+    commission_account_id: account.a_expense
+    company_id: base.main_company
+    balance_check: True
+    rule_ids:
+      - bank_statement_completion_rule_4
+      - account_statement_base_completion.bank_statement_completion_rule_4
+      - account_statement_base_completion.bank_statement_completion_rule_5
+      - account_statement_base_completion.bank_statement_completion_rule_2
+      - account_statement_base_completion.bank_statement_completion_rule_3
+-
+  Now I create a statement. I create statment lines separately because I need
+  to find each one by XML id
+-
+  !record {model: account.bank.statement, id: statement_transactionid_test1}:
+    name: Statement with transaction ID
+    profile_id: statement_profile_transactionid
+    company_id: base.main_company
+-
+  I create a statement line for a SO with transaction ID
+-
+  !record {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_transactionid}:
+    name: Test autocompletion based on SO with transaction ID
+    statement_id: statement_transactionid_test1
+    transaction_id: XXX66Z
+    ref: 6
+    date: '2014-01-06'
+    amount: 118.4
+-
+  I run the auto complete
+-
+  !python {model: account.bank.statement}: |
+    result = self.button_auto_completion(cr, uid, [ref("statement_profile_transactionid")])
+-
+  Now I can check that all is nice and shiny, line 1. I expect the SO has been
+  recognised from the transaction ID.
+-
+  !assert {model: account.bank.statement.line, id: statement_line_transactionid, string: Check completion by SO transaction ID}:
+    - partner_id.name == u'Agrolait'

account_statement_transactionid_completion/test/sale.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+-
+  I create a new Sale Order with transaction ID
+-
+  !record {model: sale.order, id: so_with_transaction_id}:
+    partner_id: base.res_partner_2
+    note: Invoice after delivery
+    payment_term: account.account_payment_term
+    transaction_id: XXX66Z
+    order_line: 
+      - product_id: product.product_product_7
+        product_uom_qty: 8