audrius/pms
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/OCA/pms.git synced 2025-01-29 00:17:45 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[RFC] Availability and free rooms

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Dario Lodeiros
2021-07-06 20:04:53 +02:00
parent 17b7921787
commit ff41cad50c
10 changed files with 314 additions and 260 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

36
pms/tests/test_pms_availability_plan_rules.py
View File

@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
---------------------
The checkin and checkout dates on which the availability will be checked are saved
in a variable and in another all the rooms of the property are also saved. Then the
rooms_available() method is launched which should return the number of available rooms
free_room_ids compute field is called which should return the number of available rooms
of the property and they are saved in another variable with which it is verified that
all the rooms have been returned because there are no availability rules for that plan.
"""
@@ -142,10 +142,12 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
[("pms_property_id", "=", self.pms_property3.id)]
)
# ACT
result = self.env["pms.availability.plan"].rooms_available(
pms_property = self.pms_property3.with_context(
checkin=checkin,
checkout=checkout,
)
result = pms_property.free_room_ids
# ASSERT
obtained = all(elem.id in result.ids for elem in test_rooms_double_rooms)
self.assertTrue(
@@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
-----------------
The checkin and checkout dates on which the availability will be checked are saved
in a variable and in another all the rooms of the property are also saved. Then create
a reservation for this property and the rooms_available() method is launched with the
a reservation for this property and the free_room_ids compute field is called with the
parameters checkin, checkout and the reservation lines of the reservation as a curent
lines, this method should return the number of available rooms of the property. Then the
result is saved in another variable with which it is verified that all the rooms have
@@ -185,11 +187,13 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
)
# ACT
result = self.env["pms.availability.plan"].rooms_available(
pms_property = self.pms_property3.with_context(
checkin=checkin,
checkout=checkout,
current_lines=test_reservation.reservation_line_ids.ids,
)
result = pms_property.free_room_ids
# ASSERT
obtained = all(elem.id in result.ids for elem in test_rooms_double_rooms)
self.assertTrue(
@@ -202,8 +206,8 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
"""
Check the availability of a room type for a property.
----------------
Double rooms of a property are saved in a variable. The rooms_available() method
is launched giving as parameters checkin, checkout and the type of room (in this
Double rooms of a property are saved in a variable. The free_room_ids compute field
is called giving as parameters checkin, checkout and the type of room (in this
case double). Then with the all () function we check that all rooms of this type
were returned.
"""
@@ -216,11 +220,12 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
]
)
# ACT
result = self.env["pms.availability.plan"].rooms_available(
pms_property = self.pms_property3.with_context(
checkin=fields.date.today(),
checkout=(fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)).date(),
room_type_id=self.test_room_type_double.id,
)
result = pms_property.free_room_ids
# ASSERT
obtained = all(elem.id in result.ids for elem in test_rooms_double_rooms)
@@ -237,7 +242,7 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
--------------------
Create an availability rule for double rooms with the field closed = true
and the date from today until tomorrow. Then the availability is saved in a
variable through the rooms_available() method, passing it the pricelist that
variable through the free_room_ids computed field, passing it the pricelist that
it contains the availability plan where the rule is included, and the checkin
and checkout dates are between the date of the rule. Then it is verified that
the double rooms are not available.
@@ -255,12 +260,14 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
}
)
# ACT
result = self.env["pms.availability.plan"].rooms_available(
pms_property = self.pms_property3.with_context(
checkin=fields.date.today(),
checkout=(fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)).date(),
# room_type_id=False, # <- (2/2)
pricelist_id=self.pricelist2.id,
)
result = pms_property.free_room_ids
# ASSERT
self.assertNotIn(
self.test_room_type_double,
@@ -283,7 +290,7 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
6. max_stay_arrival = 3
7. quota = 0
8. max_avail = 0
For each test case, it is verified through the rooms_available() method,
For each test case, it is verified through the free_room_ids compute field,
that double rooms are not available since the rules are applied to this
room type.
"""
@@ -409,12 +416,13 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
# ACT
self.test_room_type_availability_rule1.write(test_case)
result = self.env["pms.availability.plan"].rooms_available(
pms_property = self.pms_property3.with_context(
checkin=checkin,
checkout=checkout,
room_type_id=self.test_room_type_double.id,
pricelist_id=self.pricelist2.id,
)
result = pms_property.free_room_ids
# ASSERT
self.assertNotIn(
@@ -639,15 +647,17 @@ class TestPmsRoomTypeAvailabilityRules(TestPms):
for p in properties:
with self.subTest(k=p):
# ACT
rooms_avail = self.env["pms.availability.plan"].rooms_available(
pms_property = self.env["pms.property"].browse(p["property"])
pms_property = pms_property.with_context(
checkin=fields.date.today(),
checkout=(
fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=2)
).date(),
room_type_id=self.test_room_type_special.id,
pricelist_id=self.pricelist2.id,
pms_property_id=p["property"],
)
rooms_avail = pms_property.free_room_ids
# ASSERT
self.assertEqual(
len(rooms_avail) > 0, p["value"], "Availability is not correct"