mirror of
https://github.com/OCA/pms.git
synced 2025-01-29 00:17:45 +02:00
[IMP] pms: availability plans
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Eric Antones
parent
b218086024
commit
6080db54be
@@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ from . import test_pms_pricelist_priority
|
||||
from . import test_pms_checkin_partner
|
||||
from . import test_pms_sale_channel
|
||||
from . import test_pms_folio
|
||||
from . import test_pms_room_type_restriction
|
||||
|
||||
574
pms/tests/test_pms_room_type_restriction.py
Normal file
574
pms/tests/test_pms_room_type_restriction.py
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,574 @@
|
||||
import datetime
|
||||
|
||||
from _pytest.skipping import Skip
|
||||
from freezegun import freeze_time
|
||||
|
||||
from odoo import fields
|
||||
from odoo.exceptions import ValidationError
|
||||
|
||||
from .common import TestHotel
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@freeze_time("1980-01-01")
|
||||
class TestPmsRoomTypeRestriction(TestHotel):
|
||||
def create_common_scenario(self):
|
||||
# product.pricelist
|
||||
self.test_pricelist1 = self.env["product.pricelist"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "test pricelist 1",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pms.room.type.restriction
|
||||
self.test_room_type_restriction1 = self.env["pms.room.type.restriction"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Restriction plan for TEST",
|
||||
"pms_pricelist_ids": [(6, 0, [self.test_pricelist1.id])],
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pms.property
|
||||
self.test_property = self.env["pms.property"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "MY PMS TEST",
|
||||
"company_id": self.env.ref("base.main_company").id,
|
||||
"default_pricelist_id": self.test_pricelist1.id,
|
||||
"default_restriction_id": self.test_room_type_restriction1.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pms.room.type.class
|
||||
self.test_room_type_class = self.env["pms.room.type.class"].create(
|
||||
{"name": "Room"}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# pms.room.type
|
||||
self.test_room_type_single = self.env["pms.room.type"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_ids": [self.test_property.id],
|
||||
"name": "Single Test",
|
||||
"code_type": "SNG_Test",
|
||||
"class_id": self.test_room_type_class.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pms.room.type
|
||||
self.test_room_type_double = self.env["pms.room.type"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_ids": [self.test_property.id],
|
||||
"name": "Double Test",
|
||||
"code_type": "DBL_Test",
|
||||
"class_id": self.test_room_type_class.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pms.room
|
||||
self.test_room1_double = self.env["pms.room"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"name": "Double 201 test",
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"capacity": 2,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pms.room
|
||||
self.test_room2_double = self.env["pms.room"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"name": "Double 202 test",
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"capacity": 2,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pms.room
|
||||
# self.test_room3_double = self.env["pms.room"].create(
|
||||
# {
|
||||
# "pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
# "name": "Double 203 test",
|
||||
# "room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
# "capacity": 2,
|
||||
# }
|
||||
# )
|
||||
# # pms.room
|
||||
# self.test_room4_double = self.env["pms.room"].create(
|
||||
# {
|
||||
# "pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
# "name": "Double 204 test",
|
||||
# "room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
# "capacity": 2,
|
||||
# }
|
||||
# )
|
||||
# pms.room
|
||||
self.test_room1_single = self.env["pms.room"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"name": "Single 101 test",
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_single.id,
|
||||
"capacity": 1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# pms.room
|
||||
self.test_room2_single = self.env["pms.room"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"name": "Single 102 test",
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_single.id,
|
||||
"capacity": 1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@Skip
|
||||
def test_availability_rooms_all(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE
|
||||
# get availability withouth restrictions
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
|
||||
checkin = fields.date.today()
|
||||
checkout = (fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)).date()
|
||||
test_rooms_double_rooms = self.env["pms.room"].search(
|
||||
[("pms_property_id", "=", self.test_property.id)]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ACT
|
||||
result = self.env["pms.room.type.restriction"].rooms_available(
|
||||
checkin=checkin,
|
||||
checkout=checkout,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# ASSERT
|
||||
obtained = all(elem.id in result.ids for elem in test_rooms_double_rooms)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
obtained,
|
||||
"Availability should contain the test rooms"
|
||||
"because there's no restriction for them.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@Skip
|
||||
def test_availability_rooms_all_lines(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE
|
||||
# get availability withouth restrictions
|
||||
# given reservation lines to not consider
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
checkin = fields.date.today()
|
||||
checkout = (fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)).date()
|
||||
test_rooms_double_rooms = self.env["pms.room"].search(
|
||||
[("pms_property_id", "=", self.test_property.id)]
|
||||
)
|
||||
test_reservation = self.env["pms.reservation"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"checkin": checkin,
|
||||
"checkout": checkout,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ACT
|
||||
result = self.env["pms.room.type.restriction"].rooms_available(
|
||||
checkin=checkin,
|
||||
checkout=checkout,
|
||||
current_lines=test_reservation.reservation_line_ids.ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# ASSERT
|
||||
obtained = all(elem.id in result.ids for elem in test_rooms_double_rooms)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
obtained,
|
||||
"Availability should contain the test rooms"
|
||||
"because there's no restriction for them.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@Skip
|
||||
def test_availability_rooms_room_type(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE
|
||||
# get availability withouth restrictions
|
||||
# given a room type
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
test_rooms_double_rooms = self.env["pms.room"].search(
|
||||
[
|
||||
("pms_property_id", "=", self.test_property.id),
|
||||
("room_type_id", "=", self.test_room_type_double.id),
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ACT
|
||||
result = self.env["pms.room.type.restriction"].rooms_available(
|
||||
checkin=fields.date.today(),
|
||||
checkout=(fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)).date(),
|
||||
room_type_id=self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ASSERT
|
||||
obtained = all(elem.id in result.ids for elem in test_rooms_double_rooms)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
obtained,
|
||||
"Availability should contain the test rooms"
|
||||
"because there's no restriction for them.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@Skip
|
||||
def test_availability_closed_no_room_type(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE:
|
||||
# coverage for 2 points:
|
||||
# 1. without room type, restrictions associated with the pricelist are applied
|
||||
# 2. restriction rule "closed" is taken into account
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
self.test_room_type_restriction1_item1 = self.env[
|
||||
"pms.room.type.restriction.item"
|
||||
].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"restriction_id": self.test_room_type_restriction1.id,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"date": (fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=2)).date(),
|
||||
"closed": True, # <- (1/2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
# ACT
|
||||
result = self.env["pms.room.type.restriction"].rooms_available(
|
||||
checkin=fields.date.today(),
|
||||
checkout=(fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)).date(),
|
||||
# room_type_id=False, # <- (2/2)
|
||||
pricelist=self.test_pricelist1.id,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# ASSERT
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(
|
||||
self.test_room_type_double,
|
||||
result.mapped("room_type_id"),
|
||||
"Availability should not contain rooms of a type "
|
||||
"which its restriction rules applies",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@Skip
|
||||
def test_availability_restrictions(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE
|
||||
# the availability should take into acount restriction rules:
|
||||
# closed_arrival, closed_departure, min_stay, max_stay,
|
||||
# min_stay_arrival, max_stay_arrival
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
|
||||
self.test_room_type_restriction1_item1 = self.env[
|
||||
"pms.room.type.restriction.item"
|
||||
].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"restriction_id": self.test_room_type_restriction1.id,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"date": (fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=0)).date(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
checkin = fields.date.today()
|
||||
checkout = (fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)).date()
|
||||
|
||||
test_cases = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"closed": False,
|
||||
"closed_arrival": True,
|
||||
"closed_departure": False,
|
||||
"min_stay": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay": 0,
|
||||
"min_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"quota": -1,
|
||||
"max_avail": -1,
|
||||
"date": checkin,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"closed": False,
|
||||
"closed_arrival": False,
|
||||
"closed_departure": True,
|
||||
"min_stay": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay": 0,
|
||||
"min_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"quota": -1,
|
||||
"max_avail": -1,
|
||||
"date": checkout,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"closed": False,
|
||||
"closed_arrival": False,
|
||||
"closed_departure": False,
|
||||
"min_stay": 5,
|
||||
"max_stay": 0,
|
||||
"min_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"quota": -1,
|
||||
"max_avail": -1,
|
||||
"date": checkin,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"closed": False,
|
||||
"closed_arrival": False,
|
||||
"closed_departure": False,
|
||||
"min_stay": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay": 2,
|
||||
"min_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"quota": -1,
|
||||
"max_avail": -1,
|
||||
"date": checkin,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"closed": False,
|
||||
"closed_arrival": False,
|
||||
"closed_departure": False,
|
||||
"min_stay": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay": 0,
|
||||
"min_stay_arrival": 5,
|
||||
"max_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"quota": -1,
|
||||
"max_avail": -1,
|
||||
"date": checkin,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"closed": False,
|
||||
"closed_arrival": False,
|
||||
"closed_departure": False,
|
||||
"min_stay": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay": 0,
|
||||
"min_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay_arrival": 3,
|
||||
"quota": -1,
|
||||
"max_avail": -1,
|
||||
"date": checkin,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"closed": False,
|
||||
"closed_arrival": False,
|
||||
"closed_departure": False,
|
||||
"min_stay": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay": 0,
|
||||
"min_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"quota": 0,
|
||||
"max_avail": -1,
|
||||
"date": checkin,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"closed": False,
|
||||
"closed_arrival": False,
|
||||
"closed_departure": False,
|
||||
"min_stay": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay": 0,
|
||||
"min_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"max_stay_arrival": 0,
|
||||
"quota": -1,
|
||||
"max_avail": 0,
|
||||
"date": checkin,
|
||||
},
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for test_case in test_cases:
|
||||
with self.subTest(k=test_case):
|
||||
|
||||
# ACT
|
||||
self.test_room_type_restriction1_item1.write(test_case)
|
||||
|
||||
result = self.env["pms.room.type.restriction"].rooms_available(
|
||||
checkin=checkin,
|
||||
checkout=checkout,
|
||||
room_type_id=self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
pricelist=self.test_pricelist1.id,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ASSERT
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(
|
||||
self.test_room_type_double,
|
||||
result.mapped("room_type_id"),
|
||||
"Availability should not contain rooms of a type "
|
||||
"which its restriction rules applies",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@Skip
|
||||
@freeze_time("1980-11-01")
|
||||
def test_restriction_on_create_reservation(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE
|
||||
# a restriction should be applied that would prevent the
|
||||
# creation of reservations
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
self.test_room_type_restriction1_item1 = self.env[
|
||||
"pms.room.type.restriction.item"
|
||||
].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"restriction_id": self.test_room_type_restriction1.id,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"date": (fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=2)).date(),
|
||||
"closed": True,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
checkin = datetime.datetime.now()
|
||||
checkout = datetime.datetime.now() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)
|
||||
|
||||
# ACT & ASSERT
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(
|
||||
ValidationError,
|
||||
msg="Restriction should be applied that would"
|
||||
" prevent the creation of the reservation.",
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.env["pms.reservation"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"checkin": checkin,
|
||||
"checkout": checkout,
|
||||
"adults": 2,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"pricelist_id": self.test_pricelist1.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@Skip
|
||||
@freeze_time("1980-11-01")
|
||||
def test_restriction_on_create_splitted_reservation(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE
|
||||
# a restriction should be applied that would prevent the
|
||||
# creation of reservations including splitted reservations.
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
self.test_room_type_restriction1_item1 = self.env[
|
||||
"pms.room.type.restriction.item"
|
||||
].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"restriction_id": self.test_room_type_restriction1.id,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"date": (fields.datetime.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=2)).date(),
|
||||
"closed": True,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
checkin_test = datetime.datetime.now()
|
||||
checkout_test = datetime.datetime.now() + datetime.timedelta(days=4)
|
||||
|
||||
self.env["pms.reservation"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"checkin": datetime.datetime.now(),
|
||||
"checkout": datetime.datetime.now() + datetime.timedelta(days=2),
|
||||
"adults": 2,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"preferred_room_id": self.test_room1_double.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.env["pms.reservation"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"checkin": datetime.datetime.now() + datetime.timedelta(days=2),
|
||||
"checkout": datetime.datetime.now() + datetime.timedelta(days=4),
|
||||
"adults": 2,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"preferred_room_id": self.test_room2_double.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ACT & ASSERT
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(
|
||||
ValidationError,
|
||||
msg="Restriction should be applied that would"
|
||||
" prevent the creation of splitted reservation.",
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.env["pms.reservation"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"checkin": checkin_test,
|
||||
"checkout": checkout_test,
|
||||
"adults": 2,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"pricelist_id": self.test_pricelist1.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@Skip
|
||||
@freeze_time("1980-11-01")
|
||||
def test_restriction_update_quota_on_create_reservation(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE
|
||||
# quota rule is changed after creating a reservation
|
||||
# with pricelist linked to a restriction_item that applies
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
|
||||
self.test_room_type_restriction1_item1 = self.env[
|
||||
"pms.room.type.restriction.item"
|
||||
].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"restriction_id": self.test_room_type_restriction1.id,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"date": datetime.date.today(),
|
||||
"quota": 1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
r1 = self.env["pms.reservation"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"checkin": datetime.date.today(),
|
||||
"checkout": datetime.date.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=1),
|
||||
"adults": 2,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"pricelist_id": self.test_pricelist1.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
r1.flush()
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(
|
||||
ValidationError,
|
||||
msg="The quota shouldnt be enough to create a new reservation",
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.env["pms.reservation"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"checkin": datetime.date.today(),
|
||||
"checkout": datetime.date.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=1),
|
||||
"adults": 2,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"pricelist_id": self.test_pricelist1.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@freeze_time("1980-11-01")
|
||||
def test_restriction_update_quota_on_update_reservation(self):
|
||||
# TEST CASE
|
||||
# quota rule is restored after creating a reservation
|
||||
# with pricelist linked to a restriction_item that applies
|
||||
# and then modify the pricelist of the reservation and
|
||||
# no restriction applies
|
||||
|
||||
# ARRANGE
|
||||
self.create_common_scenario()
|
||||
test_quota = 2
|
||||
test_pricelist2 = self.env["product.pricelist"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "test pricelist 2",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
restriction = self.env["pms.room.type.restriction.item"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"restriction_id": self.test_room_type_restriction1.id,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"date": datetime.date.today(),
|
||||
"quota": test_quota,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
reservation = self.env["pms.reservation"].create(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pms_property_id": self.test_property.id,
|
||||
"checkin": datetime.date.today(),
|
||||
"checkout": datetime.date.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=1),
|
||||
"adults": 2,
|
||||
"room_type_id": self.test_room_type_double.id,
|
||||
"pricelist_id": self.test_pricelist1.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# ACT
|
||||
reservation.pricelist_id = test_pricelist2.id
|
||||
reservation.flush()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
test_quota,
|
||||
restriction.quota,
|
||||
"The quota should be restored after changing the reservation's pricelist",
|
||||
)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user