mirror of
https://github.com/OCA/manufacture.git
synced 2025-01-28 16:37:15 +02:00
931 lines
37 KiB
Python
931 lines
37 KiB
Python
# Copyright 2018-19 ForgeFlow S.L. (https://www.forgeflow.com)
|
|
# License LGPL-3.0 or later (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html).
|
|
|
|
from datetime import date, datetime, timedelta
|
|
|
|
from odoo import fields
|
|
|
|
from .common import TestMrpMultiLevelCommon
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestMrpMultiLevel(TestMrpMultiLevelCommon):
|
|
def test_01_mrp_levels(self):
|
|
"""Tests computation of MRP levels."""
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.fp_1.llc, 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.fp_2.llc, 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.sf_1.llc, 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.sf_2.llc, 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.pp_1.llc, 2)
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.pp_2.llc, 2)
|
|
|
|
def test_02_product_mrp_area(self):
|
|
"""Tests that mrp products are generated correctly."""
|
|
product_mrp_area = self.product_mrp_area_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.pp_1.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.supply_method, "buy")
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.main_supplier_id, self.vendor)
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.qty_available, 10.0)
|
|
product_mrp_area = self.product_mrp_area_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.sf_1.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.supply_method, "manufacture")
|
|
self.assertFalse(product_mrp_area.main_supplier_id)
|
|
self.assertFalse(product_mrp_area.main_supplierinfo_id)
|
|
# Archiving the product should archive parameters:
|
|
self.assertTrue(product_mrp_area.active)
|
|
self.sf_1.active = False
|
|
self.assertFalse(product_mrp_area.active)
|
|
|
|
def test_03_mrp_moves(self):
|
|
"""Tests for mrp moves generated."""
|
|
moves = self.mrp_move_obj.search([("product_id", "=", self.pp_1.id)])
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(moves), 3)
|
|
self.assertNotIn("s", moves.mapped("mrp_type"))
|
|
for move in moves:
|
|
self.assertTrue(move.planned_order_up_ids)
|
|
if move.planned_order_up_ids.product_mrp_area_id.product_id == self.fp_1:
|
|
# Demand coming from FP-1
|
|
self.assertEqual(move.planned_order_up_ids.mrp_action, "manufacture")
|
|
self.assertEqual(move.mrp_qty, -200.0)
|
|
elif move.planned_order_up_ids.product_mrp_area_id.product_id == self.sf_1:
|
|
# Demand coming from FP-2 -> SF-1
|
|
self.assertEqual(move.planned_order_up_ids.mrp_action, "manufacture")
|
|
if move.mrp_date == self.date_5:
|
|
self.assertEqual(move.mrp_qty, -90.0)
|
|
elif move.mrp_date == self.date_8:
|
|
self.assertEqual(move.mrp_qty, -72.0)
|
|
# Check actions:
|
|
planned_orders = self.planned_order_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.pp_1.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(planned_orders), 3)
|
|
for plan in planned_orders:
|
|
self.assertEqual(plan.mrp_action, "buy")
|
|
# Check PP-2 PO being accounted:
|
|
po_move = self.mrp_move_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.pp_2.id), ("mrp_type", "=", "s")]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(po_move), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(po_move.purchase_order_id, self.po)
|
|
self.assertEqual(po_move.purchase_line_id, self.po.order_line)
|
|
|
|
def test_04_mrp_multi_level(self):
|
|
"""Tests MRP inventories created."""
|
|
# FP-1
|
|
fp_1_inventory_lines = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.fp_1.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(fp_1_inventory_lines), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(fp_1_inventory_lines.date, self.date_7)
|
|
self.assertEqual(fp_1_inventory_lines.demand_qty, 100.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(fp_1_inventory_lines.to_procure, 100.0)
|
|
# FP-2
|
|
fp_2_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.fp_2.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_7),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(fp_2_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(fp_2_line_1.demand_qty, 15.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(fp_2_line_1.to_procure, 15.0)
|
|
fp_2_line_2 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.fp_2.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_10),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(fp_2_line_2), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(fp_2_line_2.demand_qty, 0.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(fp_2_line_2.to_procure, 0.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(fp_2_line_2.supply_qty, 12.0)
|
|
|
|
# SF-1
|
|
sf_1_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.sf_1.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_6),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(sf_1_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_1_line_1.demand_qty, 30.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_1_line_1.to_procure, 30.0)
|
|
sf_1_line_2 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.sf_1.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_9),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(sf_1_line_2), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_1_line_2.demand_qty, 24.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_1_line_2.to_procure, 24.0)
|
|
# SF-2
|
|
sf_2_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.sf_2.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_6),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(sf_2_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_2_line_1.demand_qty, 45.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_2_line_1.to_procure, 30.0)
|
|
sf_2_line_2 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.sf_2.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_9),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(sf_2_line_2), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_2_line_2.demand_qty, 36.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_2_line_2.to_procure, 36.0)
|
|
|
|
# PP-1
|
|
pp_1_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_1.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_5),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_1_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_1_line_1.demand_qty, 290.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_1_line_1.to_procure, 280.0)
|
|
pp_1_line_2 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_1.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_8),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_1_line_2), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_1_line_2.demand_qty, 72.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_1_line_2.to_procure, 72.0)
|
|
# PP-2
|
|
pp_2_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_2.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_3),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_2_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_2_line_1.demand_qty, 90.0)
|
|
# 90.0 demand - 20.0 on hand - 5.0 on PO = 65.0
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_2_line_1.to_procure, 65.0)
|
|
pp_2_line_2 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_2.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_5),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_2_line_2), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_2_line_2.demand_qty, 360.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_2_line_2.to_procure, 360.0)
|
|
pp_2_line_3 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_2.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_6),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_2_line_3), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_2_line_3.demand_qty, 108.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_2_line_3.to_procure, 108.0)
|
|
pp_2_line_4 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_2.id),
|
|
("date", "=", self.date_8),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_2_line_4), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_2_line_4.demand_qty, 48.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_2_line_4.to_procure, 48.0)
|
|
|
|
def test_05_planned_availability(self):
|
|
"""Test planned availability computation."""
|
|
# Running availability for PP-1:
|
|
invs = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.pp_1.id)], order="date"
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(invs), 2)
|
|
expected = [0.0, 0.0] # No grouping, lot size nor safety stock.
|
|
self.assertEqual(invs.mapped("running_availability"), expected)
|
|
|
|
def test_06_procure_mo(self):
|
|
"""Test procurement wizard with MOs."""
|
|
mos = self.mo_obj.search([("product_id", "=", self.fp_1.id)])
|
|
self.assertFalse(mos)
|
|
mrp_inv = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.fp_1.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.mrp_inventory_procure_wiz.with_context(
|
|
active_model="mrp.inventory",
|
|
active_ids=mrp_inv.ids,
|
|
active_id=mrp_inv.id,
|
|
).create({}).make_procurement()
|
|
mos = self.mo_obj.search([("product_id", "=", self.fp_1.id)])
|
|
self.assertTrue(mos)
|
|
self.assertEqual(mos.product_qty, 100.0)
|
|
mo_date_start = fields.Date.to_date(mos.date_start)
|
|
self.assertEqual(mo_date_start, self.date_5)
|
|
|
|
def test_07_adjust_qty_to_order(self):
|
|
"""Test the adjustments made to the qty to procure when minimum,
|
|
maximum order quantities and quantity multiple are set."""
|
|
# minimum order quantity:
|
|
mrp_inv_min = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.prod_min.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(mrp_inv_min.to_procure, 50.0)
|
|
# maximum order quantity:
|
|
mrp_inv_max = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.prod_max.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(mrp_inv_max.to_procure, 150)
|
|
plans = self.planned_order_obj.search([("product_id", "=", self.prod_max.id)])
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(plans), 2)
|
|
self.assertIn(100.0, plans.mapped("mrp_qty"))
|
|
self.assertIn(50.0, plans.mapped("mrp_qty"))
|
|
# quantity multiple:
|
|
mrp_inv_multiple = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.prod_multiple.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(mrp_inv_multiple.to_procure, 125)
|
|
|
|
def test_08_group_demand(self):
|
|
"""Test demand grouping functionality, `nbr_days`."""
|
|
pickings = self.stock_picking_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_id", "=", self.prod_test.id),
|
|
("location_id", "=", self.sec_loc.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pickings), 5)
|
|
moves = self.mrp_move_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_id", "=", self.prod_test.id),
|
|
("mrp_area_id", "=", self.secondary_area.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
supply_plans = self.planned_order_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("product_id", "=", self.prod_test.id),
|
|
("mrp_area_id", "=", self.secondary_area.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
moves_demand = moves.filtered(lambda m: m.mrp_type == "d")
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(moves_demand), 5)
|
|
# two groups expected:
|
|
# 1. days 8, 9 and 10.
|
|
# 2. days 20, and 22.
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(supply_plans), 2)
|
|
quantities = supply_plans.mapped("mrp_qty")
|
|
week_1_expected = sum(moves_demand[0:3].mapped("mrp_qty"))
|
|
self.assertIn(abs(week_1_expected), quantities)
|
|
week_2_expected = sum(moves_demand[3:].mapped("mrp_qty"))
|
|
self.assertIn(abs(week_2_expected), quantities)
|
|
|
|
def test_09_isolated_mrp_area_run(self):
|
|
"""Test running MRP for just one area."""
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.with_user(self.mrp_manager).create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.secondary_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
this = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("mrp_area_id", "=", self.secondary_area.id)], limit=1
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertTrue(this)
|
|
# Only recently exectued areas should have been created by test user:
|
|
self.assertEqual(this.create_uid, self.mrp_manager)
|
|
prev = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("mrp_area_id", "!=", self.secondary_area.id)], limit=1
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(this.create_uid, prev.create_uid)
|
|
|
|
def test_10_special_scenario_1(self):
|
|
"""When grouping demand supply and demand are in the same day but
|
|
supply goes first."""
|
|
moves = self.mrp_move_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.product_scenario_1.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(moves), 4)
|
|
mrp_invs = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.product_scenario_1.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(mrp_invs), 2)
|
|
# Net needs = 124 + 90 - 87 = 127 -> 130 (because of qty multiple)
|
|
self.assertEqual(mrp_invs[0].to_procure, 130)
|
|
# Net needs = 18, available on-hand = 3 -> 15
|
|
self.assertEqual(mrp_invs[1].to_procure, 15)
|
|
|
|
def test_11_bom_line_attribute_value_skip(self):
|
|
"""Check for the correct demand on components of a product with
|
|
multiple variants"""
|
|
product_4b_demand = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.product_4b.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertTrue(product_4b_demand)
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_4b_demand.to_procure, 100)
|
|
product_4c_demand = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.product_4c.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertTrue(product_4c_demand)
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_4c_demand.to_procure, 1)
|
|
# Testing variant BoM
|
|
# Supply of one unit for AV-12 or AV-21
|
|
av_12_supply = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.av_12.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(av_12_supply.to_procure, 1.0)
|
|
av_21_supply = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.av_21.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(av_21_supply.to_procure, 1.0)
|
|
# Testing template BoM
|
|
# Supply of 150 units for AV-11 and AV-22
|
|
av_11_supply = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.av_11.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(av_11_supply.to_procure, 100.0)
|
|
av_22_supply = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.av_22.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertTrue(av_22_supply.to_procure, 100.0)
|
|
|
|
def test_12_timezone_handling(self):
|
|
self.calendar.tz = "Australia/Sydney" # Oct-Apr/Apr-Oct: UTC+11/UTC+10
|
|
date_move = datetime(2090, 4, 19, 20, 00) # Apr 20 6/7 am in Sidney
|
|
sidney_date = date(2090, 4, 20)
|
|
self._create_picking_in(
|
|
self.product_tz, 10.0, date_move, location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.cases_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
inventory = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("mrp_area_id", "=", self.cases_area.id),
|
|
("product_id", "=", self.product_tz.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(inventory), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(inventory.date, sidney_date)
|
|
|
|
def test_13_timezone_not_set(self):
|
|
self.wh.calendar_id = False
|
|
date_move = datetime(2090, 4, 19, 20, 00)
|
|
self._create_picking_in(
|
|
self.product_tz, 10.0, date_move, location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.cases_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
inventory = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("mrp_area_id", "=", self.cases_area.id),
|
|
("product_id", "=", self.product_tz.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(inventory), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(inventory.date, date_move.date())
|
|
|
|
def test_14_units_case(self):
|
|
"""When a product has a different purchase unit of measure than
|
|
the general unit of measure and the supply is coming from an RFQ"""
|
|
prod_uom_test_inventory_lines = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.prod_uom_test.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(prod_uom_test_inventory_lines), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(prod_uom_test_inventory_lines.supply_qty, 12.0)
|
|
# Supply qty has to be 12 has a dozen of units are in a RFQ.
|
|
|
|
def test_15_phantom_comp_planning(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Phantom components will not appear in MRP Inventory or Planned Orders.
|
|
MRP Parameter will have 'phantom' supply method.
|
|
"""
|
|
# SF-3
|
|
sf_3_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.sf_3.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(sf_3_line_1), 0)
|
|
sf_3_planned_order_1 = self.planned_order_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.sf_3.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_3_planned_order_1.mrp_action, "phantom")
|
|
self.assertEqual(sf_3_planned_order_1.mrp_qty, 10.0)
|
|
# PP-3
|
|
pp_3_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_3.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_3_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_3_line_1.demand_qty, 20.0)
|
|
pp_3_planned_orders = self.planned_order_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_3.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_3_planned_orders), 2)
|
|
# PP-4
|
|
pp_4_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_4.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_4_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_4_line_1.demand_qty, 30.0)
|
|
pp_4_planned_orders = self.planned_order_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_4.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_4_planned_orders), 1)
|
|
|
|
def test_16_supply_method(self):
|
|
"""Test supply method computation."""
|
|
self.fp_4.route_ids = [(5, 0, 0)]
|
|
product_mrp_area = self.product_mrp_area_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.fp_4.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.supply_method, "none")
|
|
self.fp_4.route_ids = [(4, self.env.ref("stock.route_warehouse0_mto").id)]
|
|
product_mrp_area._compute_supply_method()
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.supply_method, "pull")
|
|
self.fp_4.route_ids = [(4, self.env.ref("mrp.route_warehouse0_manufacture").id)]
|
|
product_mrp_area._compute_supply_method()
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.supply_method, "manufacture")
|
|
# because of the issue discussed here https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/188846
|
|
# we need to apply routes explicitly in the proper order (by sequence)
|
|
self.fp_4.route_ids = [
|
|
(
|
|
6,
|
|
0,
|
|
(
|
|
self.env.ref("stock.route_warehouse0_mto")
|
|
+ self.env.ref("purchase_stock.route_warehouse0_buy")
|
|
+ self.env.ref("mrp.route_warehouse0_manufacture")
|
|
).ids,
|
|
)
|
|
]
|
|
product_mrp_area._compute_supply_method()
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.supply_method, "buy")
|
|
kit_bom = self.mrp_bom_obj.create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_tmpl_id": self.fp_4.product_tmpl_id.id,
|
|
"product_id": self.fp_4.id,
|
|
"type": "phantom",
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
product_mrp_area._compute_supply_method()
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.supply_method, "phantom")
|
|
self.assertEqual(product_mrp_area.supply_bom_id, kit_bom)
|
|
|
|
def test_17_priorize_safety_stock(self):
|
|
now = datetime.now()
|
|
product = self.prod_test # has Buy route
|
|
product.seller_ids[0].delay = 2 # set a purchase lead time
|
|
self.quant_obj._update_available_quantity(product, self.cases_loc, 5)
|
|
self.product_mrp_area_obj.create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_id": product.id,
|
|
"mrp_area_id": self.cases_area.id,
|
|
"mrp_minimum_stock": 15,
|
|
"mrp_applicable": True, # needed?
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(
|
|
product, 6.0, now + timedelta(days=3), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_in(
|
|
product, 10.0, now + timedelta(days=7), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(
|
|
product, 12.0, now + timedelta(days=14), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.cases_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
inventory = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("mrp_area_id", "=", self.cases_area.id),
|
|
("product_id", "=", product.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
expected = [
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date(),
|
|
"demand_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 10.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=3),
|
|
"demand_qty": 6.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": -1.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 6.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=7),
|
|
"demand_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 9.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": -1.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 25.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 10.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=14),
|
|
"demand_qty": 12.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": -3.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 9.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 2.0,
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(expected), len(inventory))
|
|
for test_vals, inv in zip(expected, inventory, strict=True):
|
|
for key in test_vals:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
test_vals[key],
|
|
inv[key],
|
|
f"unexpected value for {key}: {inv[key]} "
|
|
f"(expected {test_vals[key]} on {inv.date})",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_18_on_hand_with_lots(self):
|
|
"""Check that on-hand is correctly computed when tracking by lots."""
|
|
lots_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.product_lots.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(lots_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(lots_line_1.initial_on_hand_qty, 210)
|
|
self.assertEqual(lots_line_1.final_on_hand_qty, 185)
|
|
|
|
def test_19_prioritize_safety_stock_grouped_1(self):
|
|
"""Test grouped demand MRP but with a short nbr days.
|
|
Safety stock should be ordered."""
|
|
now = datetime.now()
|
|
product = self.prod_test # has Buy route
|
|
product.seller_ids[0].delay = 2 # set a purchase lead time
|
|
self.quant_obj._update_available_quantity(product, self.cases_loc, 5)
|
|
self.product_mrp_area_obj.create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_id": product.id,
|
|
"mrp_area_id": self.cases_area.id,
|
|
"mrp_minimum_stock": 15,
|
|
"mrp_nbr_days": 2,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(
|
|
product, 6.0, now + timedelta(days=3), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_in(
|
|
product, 10.0, now + timedelta(days=7), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(
|
|
product, 12.0, now + timedelta(days=14), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.cases_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
inventory = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("mrp_area_id", "=", self.cases_area.id),
|
|
("product_id", "=", product.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
expected = [
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date(),
|
|
"demand_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 10.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=3),
|
|
"demand_qty": 6.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": -1.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 6.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=7),
|
|
"demand_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 9.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": -1.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 25.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 10.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=14),
|
|
"demand_qty": 12.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": -3.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 9.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 2.0,
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(expected), len(inventory))
|
|
for test_vals, inv in zip(expected, inventory, strict=True):
|
|
for key in test_vals:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
test_vals[key],
|
|
inv[key],
|
|
f"unexpected value for {key}: {inv[key]} "
|
|
f"(expected {test_vals[key]} on {inv.date})",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_20_prioritize_safety_stock_grouped_2(self):
|
|
"""Test grouped demand MRP but with a longer nbr days.
|
|
Safety stock should be ordered."""
|
|
now = datetime.now()
|
|
product = self.prod_test # has Buy route
|
|
product.seller_ids[0].delay = 2 # set a purchase lead time
|
|
self.quant_obj._update_available_quantity(product, self.cases_loc, 5)
|
|
self.product_mrp_area_obj.create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_id": product.id,
|
|
"mrp_area_id": self.cases_area.id,
|
|
"mrp_minimum_stock": 15,
|
|
"mrp_nbr_days": 7,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(
|
|
product, 6.0, now + timedelta(days=3), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_in(
|
|
product, 10.0, now + timedelta(days=7), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(
|
|
product, 12.0, now + timedelta(days=12), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.cases_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
inventory = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("mrp_area_id", "=", self.cases_area.id),
|
|
("product_id", "=", product.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
expected = [
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date(),
|
|
"demand_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 21.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 16.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=3),
|
|
"demand_qty": 6.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": -1.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=7),
|
|
"demand_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 9.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": -1.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 27.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 10.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 2.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=12),
|
|
"demand_qty": 12.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": -3.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 9.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(expected), len(inventory))
|
|
for test_vals, inv in zip(expected, inventory, strict=True):
|
|
for key in test_vals:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
test_vals[key],
|
|
inv[key],
|
|
f"unexpected value for {key}: {inv[key]} "
|
|
f"(expected {test_vals[key]} on {inv.date})",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_21_prioritize_safety_stock_grouped_3(self):
|
|
"""Test grouped demand MRP but with an existing incoming supply
|
|
Safety stock should NOT be ordered."""
|
|
now = datetime.now()
|
|
product = self.prod_test # has Buy route
|
|
product.seller_ids[0].delay = 2 # set a purchase lead time
|
|
self.quant_obj._update_available_quantity(product, self.cases_loc, 5)
|
|
self.product_mrp_area_obj.create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_id": product.id,
|
|
"mrp_area_id": self.cases_area.id,
|
|
"mrp_minimum_stock": 15,
|
|
"mrp_nbr_days": 7,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_in(
|
|
product, 30.0, now + timedelta(days=3), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(
|
|
product, 6.0, now + timedelta(days=7), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(
|
|
product, 12.0, now + timedelta(days=12), location=self.cases_loc
|
|
)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.cases_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
inventory = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[
|
|
("mrp_area_id", "=", self.cases_area.id),
|
|
("product_id", "=", product.id),
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
expected = [
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=3),
|
|
"demand_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 35.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 35.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 30.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=7),
|
|
"demand_qty": 6.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 35.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 29.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 29.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date() + timedelta(days=12),
|
|
"demand_qty": 12.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 29.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 17.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 17.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 0.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(expected), len(inventory))
|
|
for test_vals, inv in zip(expected, inventory, strict=True):
|
|
for key in test_vals:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
test_vals[key],
|
|
inv[key],
|
|
f"unexpected value for {key}: {inv[key]} "
|
|
f"(expected {test_vals[key]} on {inv.date})",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_22_prioritize_safety_stock_with_mrp_moves_today(self):
|
|
"""Test MRP but with moves today. Safety stock should not be ordered."""
|
|
now = datetime.now()
|
|
product = self.prod_test # has Buy route
|
|
product.seller_ids[0].delay = 2 # set a purchase lead time
|
|
self.quant_obj._update_available_quantity(product, self.cases_loc, 5)
|
|
self.product_mrp_area_obj.create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_id": product.id,
|
|
"mrp_area_id": self.cases_area.id,
|
|
"mrp_minimum_stock": 15,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(product, 10.0, now, location=self.cases_loc)
|
|
self._create_picking_in(product, 20.0, now, location=self.cases_loc)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.cases_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
inventory = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("mrp_area_id", "=", self.cases_area.id), ("product_id", "=", product.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
expected = [
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date(),
|
|
"demand_qty": 10.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 15.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 20.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(expected), len(inventory))
|
|
for test_vals, inv in zip(expected, inventory, strict=True):
|
|
for key in test_vals:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
test_vals[key],
|
|
inv[key],
|
|
f"unexpected value for {key}: {inv[key]} "
|
|
f"(expected {test_vals[key]} on {inv.date})",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_23_prioritize_safety_stock_with_mrp_moves_today_grouped(self):
|
|
"""Test grouped demand MRP but with moves today. Safety stock should not be
|
|
ordered.
|
|
"""
|
|
now = datetime.now()
|
|
product = self.prod_test # has Buy route
|
|
product.seller_ids[0].delay = 2 # set a purchase lead time
|
|
self.quant_obj._update_available_quantity(product, self.cases_loc, 5)
|
|
self.product_mrp_area_obj.create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_id": product.id,
|
|
"mrp_area_id": self.cases_area.id,
|
|
"mrp_minimum_stock": 15,
|
|
"mrp_nbr_days": 2,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
self._create_picking_out(product, 10.0, now, location=self.cases_loc)
|
|
self._create_picking_in(product, 20.0, now, location=self.cases_loc)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create(
|
|
{"mrp_area_ids": [(6, 0, self.cases_area.ids)]}
|
|
).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
inventory = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("mrp_area_id", "=", self.cases_area.id), ("product_id", "=", product.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
expected = [
|
|
{
|
|
"date": now.date(),
|
|
"demand_qty": 10.0,
|
|
"final_on_hand_qty": 15.0,
|
|
"initial_on_hand_qty": 5.0,
|
|
"running_availability": 15.0,
|
|
"supply_qty": 20.0,
|
|
"to_procure": 0.0,
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(expected), len(inventory))
|
|
for test_vals, inv in zip(expected, inventory, strict=True):
|
|
for key in test_vals:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
test_vals[key],
|
|
inv[key],
|
|
f"unexpected value for {key}: {inv[key]} "
|
|
f"(expected {test_vals[key]} on {inv.date})",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_24_phantom_comp_on_hand(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
A phantom product with positive qty_available (which is computed from the
|
|
availability of its components) should not satisfy demand, because this leads
|
|
to double counting qty_available of its component products.
|
|
"""
|
|
quant = self.quant_obj.sudo().create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_id": self.pp_3.id,
|
|
"inventory_quantity": 10.0,
|
|
"location_id": self.stock_location.id,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
quant.action_apply_inventory()
|
|
quant = self.quant_obj.sudo().create(
|
|
{
|
|
"product_id": self.pp_4.id,
|
|
"inventory_quantity": 30.0,
|
|
"location_id": self.stock_location.id,
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
quant.action_apply_inventory()
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.sf_3.qty_available, 10.0)
|
|
self.mrp_multi_level_wiz.create({}).run_mrp_multi_level()
|
|
# PP-3
|
|
pp_3_line_1 = self.mrp_inventory_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_3.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_3_line_1), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_3_line_1.demand_qty, 20.0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_3_line_1.to_procure, 10.0)
|
|
pp_3_planned_orders = self.planned_order_obj.search(
|
|
[("product_mrp_area_id.product_id", "=", self.pp_3.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(pp_3_planned_orders), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(pp_3_planned_orders.mrp_qty, 10)
|
|
sf3_planned_orders = self.env["mrp.planned.order"].search(
|
|
[("product_id", "=", self.sf_3.id)]
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(sf3_planned_orders), 1)
|
|
# Trying to procure a kit planned order will have no effect.
|
|
procure_wizard = (
|
|
self.env["mrp.inventory.procure"]
|
|
.with_context(
|
|
active_model="mrp.planned.order", active_ids=sf3_planned_orders.ids
|
|
)
|
|
.create({})
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(procure_wizard.item_ids), 0)
|