mirror of
https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment.git
synced 2025-02-02 10:37:31 +02:00
05c6c0111f
The previous approach creates manually the journal entries and does all the hard work, plus not being 100% compatible with the bank statement reconciliation widget (requiring a patch on OCB to see blue lines). That decision made sense on the moment it was done (v9), where the native payment model (account.payment) was very limited, and wasn't able to store all the needed information for the bank transaction. Now that the limitations are gone, we can get rid off this extra model, and generate instead `account.payment` records, using both the native model + methods to perform the same operations. This serves also to workaround the problem found in #966. All the code, views and tests of main module have been adapted to this new approach in this commit. Later commits will adapt the rest of the modules of the suite, and add migration scripts to transit from the previous approach to this new one. TT39832
30 lines
1.2 KiB
XML
30 lines
1.2 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
|
|
<odoo>
|
|
<data noupdate="0">
|
|
<record id="group_account_payment" model="res.groups">
|
|
<field name="name">Accounting / Payments</field>
|
|
<field
|
|
name="users"
|
|
eval="[(4, ref('base.user_root')), (4, ref('base.user_admin'))]"
|
|
/>
|
|
<field name="category_id" ref="base.module_category_usability" />
|
|
</record>
|
|
</data>
|
|
<data noupdate="1">
|
|
<record id="account_payment_order_company_rule" model="ir.rule">
|
|
<field name="name">Payment order multi-company rule</field>
|
|
<field name="model_id" ref="model_account_payment_order" />
|
|
<field
|
|
name="domain_force"
|
|
>['|', ('company_id', '=', False), ('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record id="account_payment_line_company_rule" model="ir.rule">
|
|
<field name="name">Payment line multi-company rule</field>
|
|
<field name="model_id" ref="model_account_payment_line" />
|
|
<field
|
|
name="domain_force"
|
|
>['|', ('company_id', '=', False), ('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
</data>
|
|
</odoo>
|