mirror of
https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment.git
synced 2025-02-02 10:37:31 +02:00
05c6c0111f
The previous approach creates manually the journal entries and does all the hard work, plus not being 100% compatible with the bank statement reconciliation widget (requiring a patch on OCB to see blue lines). That decision made sense on the moment it was done (v9), where the native payment model (account.payment) was very limited, and wasn't able to store all the needed information for the bank transaction. Now that the limitations are gone, we can get rid off this extra model, and generate instead `account.payment` records, using both the native model + methods to perform the same operations. This serves also to workaround the problem found in #966. All the code, views and tests of main module have been adapted to this new approach in this commit. Later commits will adapt the rest of the modules of the suite, and add migration scripts to transit from the previous approach to this new one. TT39832
23 lines
864 B
XML
23 lines
864 B
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
|
|
<!--
|
|
Copyright 2015-2016 Akretion - Alexis de Lattre
|
|
Copyright 2019-2022 Tecnativa - Pedro M. Baeza
|
|
License AGPL-3.0 or later (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl).
|
|
-->
|
|
<odoo noupdate="1">
|
|
<record id="account_payment_line_seq" model="ir.sequence">
|
|
<field name="name">Payment Line</field>
|
|
<field name="code">account.payment.line</field>
|
|
<field name="prefix">P</field>
|
|
<field name="padding">5</field>
|
|
<field name="company_id" eval="False" />
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record id="account_payment_order_seq" model="ir.sequence">
|
|
<field name="name">Payment Order</field>
|
|
<field name="code">account.payment.order</field>
|
|
<field name="prefix">PAY</field>
|
|
<field name="padding">4</field>
|
|
<field name="company_id" eval="False" />
|
|
</record>
|
|
</odoo>
|